Recently, an account on a platform nicknamed “Huaping Girls’ High School Zhang Guimei” continued to release a number of educational information, including a number of marketing articles.After verification, zhang Guimei has not registered a relevant account on Toutiao, but “Huaping Girls’ High School Zhang Guimei” is a fake account.In order to protect the reputation of Zhang Guimei, winner of “July 1st Medal”, and prevent others from using zhang Guimei’s name to commit illegal acts on the Internet, the Network information Office of Lijiang Municipal Party Committee closed down the account according to law.The Internet is a mirror that can not only see the beauty of The Times, but also expose the problems.Reflecting on the case, “three questions” inevitably arise: Is there a problem with the integrity of the person involved?Are there loopholes in online regulation?Is legal education for citizens in place?Pretending to be zhang Guimei teacher’s reputation to open a network account, reflects the lack of integrity, moral corruption, to everyone respected “July 1 medal” winner Comrade Zhang Guimei no awe of the heart.According to the netizen comment: “pretend to be Zhang Guimei teacher, is not a person” “publish the article to be practical and realistic, rely on real ability to speak, this kind of thing also can do?Sad…”False name successfully opened operation network account, network supervision is not strict enough, there are loopholes to open account audit, so that the unscrupulous have a chance.At the same time, the person involved in illegal acts on the network, the infringement of zhang Guimei teacher’s right of reputation, touched the bottom line of the law.Although the Network information Office of lijiang Municipal Party Committee closed the account according to law, the case attracted high social attention.In my humble opinion, it is necessary to deal with this matter actively and properly, focusing on four aspects and doing a good job in the “second half of the article”.First, punishing those involved in the case in accordance with the law.To handle the case in accordance with the law, so that those involved in the law will be punished by the law, to ensure that the law must be observed, the law must be strictly enforced, and violations of the law must be prosecuted, so that this case has become a vivid network law enforcement textbook.Second, continue to purify the Internet environment.We should continue to take cybersecurity oversight as an extremely important task, make up for “weak links” in cybersecurity oversight, strengthen cybersecurity oversight, and create a peaceful and sunny cyber environment.Third, local governments should take this case as a mirror, continue to deepen the construction of civic morality, give higher priority to honesty education, and guide the people to respect facts, conduct themselves honestly, and conscientiously buckle the “first button” of honesty.Fourth, we will continue to strengthen legal education.Local governments need to ensure that the work of popularizing the Law is fully implemented, and enrich the methods of educating the public about the law, so that citizens can know, understand, abide by, and respect the Law.Network “counterfeit” by legal disposal, to blame!Reviewing this case, we should draw a profound lesson: the Internet is absolutely illegal, once the operation of the Internet deviates from the integrity, touch the bottom line of the law, will be condemned by the society and legal punishment.Palm Spring City special commentator: Black fish Editor: Sha Lanmei editor: Zheng Yangyang Final: Zhou Jianjun Statement: reprint this article is for the purpose of conveying more information.If the source is wrong or violated your legitimate rights and interests, please contact the author with proof of ownership, we will promptly correct, delete, thank you.Email address: newmedia@xxcb.cn